Legal Opinion

State v. Tuma

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1981No. TC 80-1374 and 80-1378, CA 19285, SC 27774PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

In this case, as in State v. Dillon, 292 Or 172, 637 P2d 602 (1981), and State v. Eastman Kovach, 292 Or 184, 637 P2d 609 (1981) (decided this date), we consider the circumstances under which ORS 137.103 to 137.109 authorizes a sentence of restitution.

Defendant was convicted of two burglaries. He was sentenced to a term not to exceed 10 years. In addition, he was ordered to pay restitution to the victims of the burglaries of which he was convicted, plus several others which he admitted, for property stolen or damaged during the burglaries, and for air fare expenses incurred by several victims…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. LefthandbullOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. HazlittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API