Legal Opinion

Hawley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1926No. 7227PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANT, District Judge.

This is a proceeding by libel for the forfeiture of an automobile seized in Muskogee county, Oklahoma. The claim of forfeiture was originally based on two grounds:

Pirst, that the automobile was a conveyance which was being used in the removal and concealment of intoxicating liquor upon which the tax had not been paid to the Unit-: ed States, as provided by law, with intent to defraud the United States of such tax. This charge was based on the provisions of section 3450, Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 6352). Second, that the automobile was being used and had been used in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Browning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Kennedy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. McClintic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  4. Elam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  5. Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. Tiller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  3. United States v. One Chevrolet Coup AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. One Ford Two-Door Sedan 1941 ModelDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1947
  5. Terrence Lamar Wilburn v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API