Terrence Lamar Wilburn v. City of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TERRENCE LAMAR WILBURN, No. 2:26-cv-1627 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has requested leave to proceed in forma 18 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 19 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 21 Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915(a). ECF No. 7.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.