Legal Opinion

Tiller v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1929No. 100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was convicted of a violation of section 1 of the Act of Congress of June 30, 1919 (41 Stat. 4 [25 USCA § 244]), commonly referred to as the Hastings Amendment, which prohibits the possession of intoxicating liquors in the Indian country, or where the introduction of such liquors is or was prohibited by treaty or federal statute. The government's evidence was clear and convincing, and the defendant offered no evidence.

The defendant- contends that the indictment is vague, indefinite and uncertain in two particulars. The indictment alleged the time of the commission of the offense…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jarl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Lucas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Sharp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salerno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Littlewood v. KyleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API