Browning v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, District Judge.
Plaintiff in error was indicted, tried, and convicted for having in his possession on or about the 19th of February, 1922, intoxicating liquor “in and upon the Indian country, to wit, Osage county, Oklahoma.”
The prosecution was had, according to the statement of counsel’ for plaintiff in error, under Act June 30, 1919, c. 4, § 1 (41 Stat. 4 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 4137aa]); but, according to the statement of counsel for defendant in error, under Act May 25, 1918, e. 86, § 1 (40 Stat. 563 [Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 4137aa]), which, so far as here…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Swafford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Lucas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Elam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Sharp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Hawley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.