Legal Opinion

Browning v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1925No. 6489PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, District Judge.

Plaintiff in error was indicted, tried, and convicted for having in his possession on or about the 19th of February, 1922, intoxicating liquor “in and upon the Indian country, to wit, Osage county, Oklahoma.”

The prosecution was had, according to the statement of counsel’ for plaintiff in error, under Act June 30, 1919, c. 4, § 1 (41 Stat. 4 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 4137aa]); but, according to the statement of counsel for defendant in error, under Act May 25, 1918, e. 86, § 1 (40 Stat. 563 [Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 4137aa]), which, so far as here…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Swafford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. Lucas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Elam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Sharp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Hawley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API