Legal Opinion

Huge v. Ondesko

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-1082PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN L. MILLER, Senior District Judge.

This labor case, brought pursuant to Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, involves the basic question of whether the defendants are obligated to pay into the pension fund that is administered by plaintiffs pursuant to the 1971 coal wage agreement. Much of the factual background is not in dispute; thus, the following account, submitted by stipulation 1 , is adopted by the Court.

Plaintiffs are the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950 (Fund), a trust with its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Lewis v. KernsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1959
  3. Thomas v. Blue Coal CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Bugher v. OHIO PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Combs v. Hawk Contracting, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Combs v. Maben Energy Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1986
  3. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co. v. District 2, United Mine Workers of America, Sub-District 4District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API