Legal Opinion

Bugher v. OHIO PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 4, 1975No. Civ. A. 73-235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings which the Court shall consider as a motion for summary judgment under the provisions of Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition.

This is an action under the Labor Management Relations Act. The de fendant is an employer who entered into a collective bargaining agreement requiring it to make periodic payments into specified union trust funds. As trustees of the funds, plaintiffs contend that the defendant has failed to make…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jensen v. GarvisonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Alco Express Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  2. Huge v. Maximeadows Mining Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1978
  3. Huge v. OndeskoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API