Legal Opinion

Jeddo-Highland Coal Co. v. District 2, United Mine Workers of America, Sub-District 4

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1995No. 3:CV-93-0125Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

VANASKIE, District Judge.

This litigation under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, concerns an arbitrator’s decision that the loading and hauling of “culm” owned by Morea Cogen, Inc. (“Morea”) and located at a “coal breaker” operated by Plaintiff JeddoHighland Coal Company (“Jeddo-Highland”) is subject to the work jurisdiction provisions of the Anthracite Wage Agreement of 1990 (hereinafter referred to as the “1990 AWA”).1 *928Jeddo-Highland, an employer in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. §§ 142 and 152, is a signatory to the 1990…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Stroehmann Bakeries, Inc. v. Local 776, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Exxon Shipping Company v. Exxon Seamen's UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API