Legal Opinion

Arriaga v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 31, 1991No. 04-89-00053-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARR, Justice.

This is an appeal from a jury conviction of unlawful delivery of heroin less than twenty-eight grams. The trial court assessed a punishment of ten years confinement, probated, and a $1,000.00 fine. Appellant, David Morua Arriaga, brings this appeal raising four points of error.

In his first point of error appellant asserts the trial court committed reversible error by denying appellant’s timely request to make an opening statement to the jury immediately following the State’s opening. At the conclusion of the State’s opening argument, appellant’s counsel asked to make an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Dixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. In re T.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Ojeda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Twine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API