Legal Opinion
Tingley v. 900 Monroe, LLC
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 26, 2005No. Docket 243171, 244609PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilder, J.
In these consolidated cases, plaintiffs, William Q. Tingley, III (Tingley III), William Q. Tingley (Tingley), and Daniel R. Bradley, 1 appeal as of right the trial court’s order dismissing their amended complaint in Docket No. 243171 and the trial court’s order granting sanctions in Docket No. 244609. We affirm in part and reverse in part. 2
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
These cases arise out of a property dispute involving an abandoned street between the corporate plaintiffs’ 3 place of business and a neighboring fitness center on Ottawa Avenue in Grand Rapids. Because of road construction on…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Fayerweather v. RitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Belle Isle Grill Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Kellogg (In Re West Texas Marketing Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Plaza Associates v. Unified Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- TOLL NORTHVILLE, LTD. v. Township of NorthvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Tingley v. 900 MONROE LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Tingley v. 900 MONROE LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- William Q Tingley Iii v. 900 Monroe LlcMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.