Legal Opinion

Tingley v. 900 MONROE LLC

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2007No. Docket 243171Published

1Opinion of the Court

733 N.W.2d 440 (2007)

274 Mich. App. 335

William Q. TINGLEY, III, William Q. Tingley, and Daniel R. Bradley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

Proto-Cam, Inc., Bend Tooling, Inc., and Tennine Corporation, Plaintiffs,

v.

900 MONROE L.L.C., Robert F. Wardrop II, William H. Fisher III, Todd R. Dickinson, Wardrop & Wardrop, P.C., Dickinson Wright, P.L.L.C., Fisher & Dickinson, P.C., 940 Monroe L.L.C., Pioneer Incorporated, City of Grand Rapids, John H. Logie, Dykema Excavators, Inc., and Fifth Third Bancorp, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 243171.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Submitted August 1, 2006, at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lee v. MacOmb County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Tingley v. KortzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Tingley v. 900 Monroe, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API