Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Knaus v. Village of Hinsdale

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 25, 1969No. Gen. 69-11PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

The trial court entered judgment in Quo Warranto ousting the Village from certain territory alleged to have been annexed in 1923, and setting aside a 1967 annexation which would thereby lack contiguity to the Village.

The Village, appealing from the judgment, urges that there is no omission between the west boundary of the 1923 annexation and the east boundary of the 1967 annexation; but that, in any event, plaintiffs are estopped because of acquiescence in the exercise of jursidiction by Hinsdale in the disputed area for some 40 years.

Plaintiffs argue that no ambiguity exists with reference…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Adamowski v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People ex rel. Cooney v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People Ex Rel. Town of Richwoods v. City of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. People Ex Rel. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. City of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. People ex rel. Mohlenbrock v. PikeIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Village of Long Grove v. Village of Buffalo GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. People Ex Rel. Village of Northbrook v. City of Highland ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. People Ex Rel. Vanderhyden v. Village of ElwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. People Ex Rel. Cherry Valley Fire Protection District v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. People Ex Rel. Koplin v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API