Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Koplin v. Village of Hinsdale

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1976No. 75-221PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs are the beneficial owners of an 11-acre complex which includes a 156-unit, 17-story apartment budding and a 4-story office building known as the Koplin tract. The complex is bounded on three sides by Hinsdale and on the fourth by the Cook County Forest Preserve.

Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking leave of the court to file two complaints in quo warranto, one attacking the validity of the villages ordinance annexing the Spinning Wheel tract adjacent to plaintiffs’ property, and the second attacking the validity of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Adamowski v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People Ex Rel. Vanderhyden v. Village of ElwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. People ex rel. Lutz v. FranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People ex rel. Zimmerman v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Maywood-Proviso State Bank v. City of Oakbrook TerraceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Village of Long GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. People Ex Rel. City of North Chicago v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. People Ex Rel. Village of Buffalo Grove v. Village of Long GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. People Ex Rel. Village of Long Grove v. Village of Buffalo GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. In Re Application of County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API