Legal Opinion
Hooker v. Hoey
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 20, 1939No. 71PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
107 F.2d 1016 (1939)
George W. HOOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James J. HOEY, Collector of the United States Internal Revenue for the Second District of the State of New York, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 20, 1939.
Holt S. McKinney, of New York City, for appellant.
John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Dolores C. Faconti, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
2Per curiam
Judgment affirmed on opinion below, D. C., 27 F.Supp. 489.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Hooker v. HoeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
4Cited by2 opinions
- Kneeland v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Tesorero de Puerto Rico v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952