Legal Opinion

Gray v. Subsequent Injury Fund

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1987No. 1583PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Chief Judge.

No one disputes that John M. Gray is totally and permanently disabled within the meaning of the Maryland Workmen’s Compensation Act.

No one disputes that Mr. Gray sustained an accidental injury in October 1978 and that, as a result, 40 percent of the 100 percent total permanent disability is attributable to that particular accident.

No one disputes that Mr. Gray’s employer, Mass Transit Administration, is responsible for the payment of $13,600.1

No one disputes that Mr. Gray also suffers from asthma, loss of vision in his right eye, hypertension and “type II Diabetes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injury Fund v. PackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Subsequent Injury Fund v. ChapmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Subsequent Injury Fund v. SlaterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wright v. Philip Electronics North AmericaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Darden v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API