Legal Opinion

Darden v. Mass Transit Administration

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 4, 2005No. Nos. 0032 & 0033Published

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

In the context of Workers’ Compensation law, a subsequent injury on the heels of a prior partial disability sometimes creates the arithmetic anomaly of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. In this appeal, that anomaly poses the question of whether the subsequent employer, in such a ease, is responsible for the whole or only for a particular part. Is the responsibility of the employer in any way altered, moreover, if the subsequent employer happens to have been, coincidentally, the earlier employer as well? To the problem of who picks up the tab for the difference…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injury Fund v. PackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Subsequent Injury Fund v. ChapmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Subsequent Injury Fund v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Cline v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API