Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Fund v. Slater

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 27, 1975No. 854, September Term, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMenchine, J.

This is an appeal by the Subsequent Injury Fund from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County reversing a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission.

The facts, necessary for understanding of the issue submitted for our decision, are these: Billy Earl Slater (claimant), a retired Navy veteran with twenty years of active service, who was receiving $245.00 monthly 1 for 40% disability of his body, sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. He filed claim against Charles L. Cooper, t/a Cheverly City Service, and his insurer, Erie…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Casualty Insurance v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Pressman v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Scoville Service, Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Cearfoss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  5. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Mayor of RockvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. ARA Vending Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Hodgson v. FLIPPO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Gray v. Subsequent Injury FundCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Maryland Hospital Laundry v. MarshallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Shapiro & Duncan, Inc. v. PayneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API