Legal Opinion

Cullingham v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1943No. 31579PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.

This is an action by Sidney J. Cullingham and Barton H. Kuhns, executors and trustees of the estate of Alice C. Howell, deceased, and others, plaintiffs and appellees, against the city of Omaha, Nebraska, and Otto J. Bauman, City Treasurer of the city of Omaha, defendants and appellants, to have title quieted in the respective plaintiffs to real es*745tate owned by them in the city of Omaha, Douglas county, Nebraska.

It is the claim of plaintiffs that the defendant, city of Omaha, by ordinance, levied a special assessment for repaving a part of Twenty-fourth street and for readjusting and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Interstate Power Co. v. City of AinsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Carr v. FenstermacherNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hutchinson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Morris v. MerrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Harmon v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cosentino v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pratt v. Water District No. 79Washington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Besack v. City of BeatriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Shanahan v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API