Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Water District No. 79

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1961No. 35590PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Appellants Pratt and McIntosh sued to remove utility local improvement district assessments upon their property. Upon the defendant water district’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court dismissed with prejudice, from which judgment plaintiffs appeal.

Appellants, by recorded conveyance, acquired the property November 15, 1956. Appellants discussed with the respondent water district the formation of a ULID for service to their property, but when the district declined, appellants then installed their own works. According to custom, the water district’s engineer inspected the completed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. Hearty v. MullinWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Waldrip v. Olympia Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Shew v. Coon Bay Loafers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Fritz v. Board of TrusteesIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Patchell v. City of PuyallupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Carlisle v. COLUMBIA IRR. DIST.Washington Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API