Interstate Power Co. v. City of Ainsworth
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This is a suit to enjoin performance of a contract for the construction of an electric light and power plant and electric distribution system in and for the city of Ainsworth, to be paid for only out of future net earnings of the plant. The trial court denied the injunction, and plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff is a taxpayer in the defendant city, in which it owns and operates an electric distribution system. The contract in question provides for the construction of a plant and distribution system at a cost of $90,629, plus $5,200 engineering fees, all of which is to be paid out of future…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consumers Coal Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Van Eaton v. Town of SidneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- City of Ft. Scott v. W. G. Eads Brokerage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Branham v. Mayor & Common CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Carr v. FenstermacherNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- May v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Wagner v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Whipps v. Town of GreybullWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Peterson v. VasakNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.