Legal Opinion

Besack v. City of Beatrice

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1951No. 32908PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chappell, J;

This action in equity was brought by plaintiffs for themselves and all others similarly situated to have a special assessment upon their real estate in sewer district No.-60 declared void; to enjoin defendant city from enforcing or attempting to enforce the assessment; to require it to reassess the cost of construction and eliminate therefrom all costs and expenses of construction of any portion of said sewer situated in sewer district No. 28 and outside the boundaries of sewer district No. 60; and for general equitable relief.

Plaintiffs’ petition, defendant’s answer, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Batty v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Harmon v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. City of McCook v. Red Willow CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Power v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. City of Bartlesville v. KeelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Phoenix Title & Trust Company v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Blackledge v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. SID No. 596 v. THG DevelopmentNebraska Supreme Court · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API