Devcon Corporation v. Woodhill Chemical Sales Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
We have before us a motion to stay, pending appeal, a preliminary injunction granted against asserted trademark infringement. Except to say that it raises grave doubts, we will reserve until a later date discussing a procedure under which the only hearing given the defendant on such an important matter was before a magistrate. The magistrate wrote an opinion in which he found that there is a great likelihood of consumer confusion between the products of the plaintiff and defendant; that plaintiff’s mark is not descriptive but suggestive, and that plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bayer Co. v. United Drug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- DuPont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Esquire, Inc. v. Esquire Slipper Manufacturing Co., Inc., Esquire Slipper Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Esquire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- Bennett v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- A.J. Canfield Company, a Corporation v. Honickman, Harold, an Individual and Concord Beverage Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Victor Decosta v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Valmor Products Company v. Standard Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Professional Economics, Inc. v. Professional Economic Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Trak Inc. v. BENNER SKI KG & Bavarian Ski Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.