A.J. Canfield Company, a Corporation v. Honickman, Harold, an Individual and Concord Beverage Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns trademark rights in the phrase “Diet Chocolate Fudge Soda,” the name of a drink with which Plaintiff-Appellant, A.J. Canfield Co. (“Canfield”), has recently achieved meteoric success. In the district court, Canfield sought a preliminary injunction barring Defendant Concord Beverage Co. (“Concord”) from using this name in connection with a soft drink Concord sells in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York. The district court refused to issue the injunction, A.J. Canfield Co. v. Concord Beverage Co., 629 F.Supp. 200 (E.D.Pa.1985),…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nola Spice Designs, L.L.C. v. Haydel Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Fisons Horticulture, Inc., in No. 93-7224 v. Vigoro Industries, Inc., in No. 93-7287Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Genesee Brewing Company, Inc., D/B/A Highfalls Brewing Company v. Stroh Brewing Company, D/B/A Northern Plains Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.