Richardson v. Hislop
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
On July 14, 1922, the plaintiff Eri H. Richardson and the defendants James W. His-lop and A. C. Myers entered into an agreement of partnership under the name of Clay Glow Tile Company by which they agreed to engage in the business of buying, selling and retailing goods, wares and merchandise for cash, on a commission basis or otherwise, but more especially to deal in clay and tile products, including terra cotta and ornamental tile of all descriptions; together with any other articles or products appertaining or belonging thereto.
The partnership was to continue for one…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- De La Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Green County v. QuinlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
- Horacek v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948