Legal Opinion

Horacek v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1948No. S. F. 17743PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

In 1928, Josephine Horacek was employed as a maid in the home of Victor B. Smith. Except for a short period of time, she continued her services until 1945. During these years the amount paid to her monthly was reduced from time to time. Miss Horacek claims that she accepted these payments on account and not in full satisfaction of wages due to her. The appeal of Smith and his wife Florence is from a judgment against them in an action upon the contract of employment.

The complaint alleges that in 1928 the Smiths employed Miss Horacek as housekeeper at a salary of $75 per month with room and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Van Buskirk v. KuhnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. De La Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Richardson v. HislopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wilson v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Falahati v. KondoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. McAllister v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API