Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Schuck v. John Morrell & Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1995No. 18721PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEEVER, Circuit Judge.

William C. Schuck (Schuck) filed a petition with the Department of Labor (Department) seeking worker’s compensation benefits for injuries incurred while employed at John Morrell & Co. (Morrell). The Department dismissed Schuck’s petition concluding that he failed to prove causation and failed to give the required notice of injury. The circuit court reversed the Department’s decision on both the causation and notice issues and remanded the case for a determination of compensation benefits. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

Schuck worked for Morrell at its Aberdeen…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Petersen v. Hinky DinkySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hisgen v. HisgenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Loewen v. Hyman Freightways, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tischler v. United Parcel ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Enger v. FMCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Westergren v. Baptist Hospital of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API