Legal Opinion
Bradshaw v. Bowden
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 29, 1914No. 2905PublishedCited by 10 opinions
At Law. Action by R. G. Bradshaw against E. C. Bowden and others. On motion to remand.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
This is an action for damages for alleged malitious prosecution, commenced in the state court and re-. *325moved to this court upon the petition of the defendant’ E. C. Bowden, an alien citizen of England. Plaintiff—
“niovw the court to remand this canso to the state court, for the reason that it ¡jJiií'iuarnoly appears from the complaint and petition of the defendant that this court did not have original jurisdiction of this action, and that the state court is the proper tribunal where this cause of action should be tried and determined.”
Defendant’s veriñed petition…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leonard v. St. Joseph Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. of Hardinsburg v. Atchison, T. & S. F. RY. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Crockett v. OverfieldDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1938
- E. H. Emery & Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- City of Seattle v. Beer's Bldg. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.