E. H. Emery & Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Seneca Cornell, Judge. The necessary fads are slated in tlie opinion.- -
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
I. Separate petitions were filed by plaintiff against eight different railroad companies, in each of which the American Refrigerator Transit Company was joined as defendant. The defendants upon whom service of notice was had and who appeared and answered are as follows, to wit: The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company, the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, the Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, and ihe Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Original notice was served upon the Refrigerator Company in Linn…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Railroad Co. v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mann v. City of MarshalltownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Automated Donut Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- E. H. Emery & Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Johannsen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Porter v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926