Warwick v. Bliss

Plaintiff originally brought this action against defendant for damages for malpractice. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony defendant moved for £ 'directed verdict on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to entitle plaintiff to recover. This motion was denied. Defendant made the same *108motion at the close of all the testimony and it was again denied. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, after which defendant moved for judgment non obstante upon the same grounds as set out in his two previous motions for directed verdict. This motion was likewise denied, and judgment on the…