Legal Opinion

Strecker v. Railson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1910PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, McIntosh county; Allen, J. Action by Frank H. Strecker against Edward Railson. From an order denying defendant’s motion for a dismissal and granting plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFisk, J.

This cause was here on a former appeal. See 16 N. D. 68, 111 N. W. 612, 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1099. It was there held that *678the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and also that certain testimony offered by plaintiff to prove a foreign judgment of a justice of the peace was inadmissable. The concluding portion of the opinion contained the following language: “For the foregoing reasons the judgment appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law; appellant to recover his costs and disbursements in both courts.” The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olson v. MattisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  2. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. BlakemoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Larson v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Waldo v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Singer v. AustinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stimson v. StimsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ellingson v. Northwestern Jobbers Credit BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Whitney v. RitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Torgerson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API