Legal Opinion

Young v. Woodall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 1996No. 265PA95Published

1Opinion of the Court

471 S.E.2d 357 (1996)

343 N.C. 459

Kimberly (Hicks) YOUNG

v.

Christopher Allen WOODALL in his individual capacity and as an officer of the Winston-Salem Police Department and

Winston-Salem Police Department and

The City of Winston-Salem.

No. 265PA95.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 13, 1996.

Wright, Parrish, Newton & Rabil, L.L.P. by Melvin F. Wright, Jr., and Nils E. Gerber, Winston Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C. by Gusti W. Frankel, Winston Salem, for defendants-appellants.

AnnFrances M. Shaver, High Point Police Attorney, amicus curiae, for North…

Also in this document: Dissent · Frye; Dissent · Whichard.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Bullins v. SchmidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. DiDonato v. WortmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API