Legal Opinion

Lariviere v. Lariviere

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 6, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is a petition for divorce. The court below dismissed the proceeding upon the ground that a valid marriage between the parties had not been shown. The petitioner excepted.

A finding of facts was filed, from which the following appears: The petitionee married Valida Monette, on June 3, 1908, at Montreal, Quebec. Both were at that time domiciled in that city. On May 16, 1916, a decree of separation from bed and board ivas granted to Valida by the Superior Court of Montreal. Subsequently the petitionee became domiciled in Holyoke, Massachusetts, and while there brought a petition for divorce…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. KimmellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
  3. Schaffer v. KrestovnikowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  4. Fensterwald v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Canale v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Lariviere v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  3. Kisla v. KislaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Lariviere v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  5. Rhodes v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API