Legal Opinion

Lariviere v. Larocque

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 6, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

The parties went through a marriage ceremony at Montreal, Province of Quebec, on June 16, 1924. At the time and continuing during the period covered by the transactions here involved, both parties believed and understood that the marriage was valid and that they • were legally husband and wife. This marriage was afterwards held to be void (see Lariviere v. Lariviere, 102 Vt. 278, 147 Atl. 700). About ten years before the supposed marriage, the parties had a son born out of wedlock.

After the marriage and until about January, 1926, the plaintiff lived in Springfield, Mass., and the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. GouldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Hitchcock v. KennisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  3. Olmstead v. AbbottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  4. Lariviere v. LariviereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  5. Peck v. City Trust CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Potwin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  3. Lariviere v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Levin v. RouilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  5. Flint Et Ux. v. Davis Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API