Legal Opinion
Day v. Davidson
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1997No. 96-266PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The question in this case is the effect to be given a judgment, based on vicarious liability and entered against an employer, following an offer of judgment and acceptance of that offer, in a subsequent action brought against the negligent employee. After accepting an offer of judgment made by Pamida, Inc. (Pa-mida), which was entered and satisfied, Clementine Day and Antoine Day (Days) brought this action against Keith Davidson (Davidson). The judgment against Pamida was based upon vicarious liability flowing from Davidson’s negligent conduct. The trial court ruled that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chrysler Corp. v. TodorovichWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Cervelli v. GravesWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Satsky v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Eklund v. PRI Environmental, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Yenne-Tully v. STATE EX REL. WYOMING WORKERS'SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISIONWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Gonzales v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Exxon Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners, Sublette CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Rudy v. BossardWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.