Legal Opinion

Eklund v. PRI Environmental, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2001No. 00-51, 00-52PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] Randy Eklund (Eklund) was injured when the vehicle in which he was a passenger was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by a co-worker, Terry Tebben (Tebben). The district court concluded that the co-worker was not acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident and granted the employer's, PRI Environmental, Inc.'s (PRI), motion for summary judgment on Ek-lTund's claim of vicarious liability on the theory of respondeat superior. Eklund also contends that a prior settlement entered into between PRI and the driver of Eklund's vehicle constituted collateral…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Beard v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Slavens v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Shirley Clark v. Haas Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Combined Insurance Co. of America v. SinclairWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Aragon v. AragonWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dewey v. WentlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Markstein v. Countryside I, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Nuhome Investments, LLC v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Pokorny v. SalasWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API