Legal Opinion

Vincent Metro, LLC v. Ginsberg

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 18, 2012No. AC 33654PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHELDON, J.

The plaintiff, Vincent Metro, LLC, a licensed real estate broker, commenced this action against four defendants — Kenneth S. Ginsberg and his company, YAH Realty, LLC (YAH), and two of their customers, John Fitzpatrick (John) and Rose Fitzpatrick (Rose) — to recover commissions it claims to have earned under an exclusive listing agreement between itself and YAH for certain of YAH’s commercial condominium units in Hamden. The action is now before this court on the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiffs application for a prejudgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Storm Associates, Inc. v. BaumgoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Covino v. PfefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Revere Real Estate, Inc. v. CeratoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Dyas v. AkstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Calco Construction & Development Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. General Electric Capital Corp. v. Metz Family Enterprises, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Reyher v. FinkeldeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API