Legal Opinion
Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Calco Construction & Development Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 26, 2013No. AC 34039PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ESPINOSA, J.
The plaintiff, Landmark Investment Group, LLC, appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying its application for a prejudgment remedy in the underlying civil action against the defendants Calco Construction & Development Company (Calco) and John A. Senese.1 The plaintiff claims that, on the basis of the court’s unchallenged factual findings, the court committed clear error by concluding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate probable cause that the defendants (1) tortiously interfered with the plaintiffs contractual relations with a third party, Chung Family Realty…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sportsmen's Boating Corp. v. HensleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Chung Family Realty Partnership, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- STANCUNA v. SchafferConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- ANDY'S OIL SERVICE, INC. v. HobbsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bagley v. Yale UniveristyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Richards v. Direct Energy Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Cooke v. KennyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Coppola Construction Co. v. Hoffman Enterprises Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. CALCO Construction & Development Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.