Legal Opinion

In re Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 2001No. 99-BG-479Published

1Per curiam

This attorney discipline case encompasses two matters involving District of Columbia Bar member Erroll D. Brown.1 Neither Mr. Brown nor Bar Counsel has filed an exception to the report and recommendation of the District of Columbia Board of Professional Responsibility (“Board”).

I

In the first matter, Mr. Brown has petitioned for reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar subsequent to a thirty-day suspension with a requirement that he show fitness prior to reinstatement. See In re Brown, 709 A.2d 724, 725 (D.C.1998). This court disciplined Mr. Brown at the urging of the Board. The Board’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API