Legal Opinion

John K. Shurie v. Wesley Q. Richmond

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 14, 1983No. 82-581PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OSCAR H. DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

Senior party John K. Shurie appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 141 (1976) from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the Patent and Trademark Office (the Board) in interference No. 99,667. The board awarded priority of invention to junior party Wesley Q. Richmond. We affirm.

I

The subject of the interference is a process for producing metal oxides which could be employed as abrasive particles for grinding purposes when crushed. The sole count in interference describes the invention as:

A process for making fusion cast metal oxides comprising pouring a molten…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Morway v. BondiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Anderson v. NattaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson and Personal Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Messerschmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
  5. John D. Scott and Rachel A. Steven v. Satoshi Koyama, Yukio Homoto, and Naoki EsakaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API