Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Natta
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 19, 1973No. Patent Appeal Nos. 8818-8820PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
These appeals are from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences, adhered to on reconsideration, awarding priority of invention of the sole count in issue to none of the three parties involved. This three-party interference was declared on January 12, 1965. Each party took testimony and submitted exhibits. Indeed, the transcript of record before this court consumes almost 4400 pages spanning five volumes. We have considered that record, which includes the decisions of the board, and the arguments advanced by each of the parties, and for reasons set forth herein, we reverse…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Kawai v. MetlesicsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Campbell v. WettsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Rey-Bellet v. EngelhardtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- In Re Karl Ziegler and Heinz MartinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.