Legal Opinion

CBI Na-Con, Inc. v. UOP, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 20, 1998No. 01-96-00819-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAFT, Justice.

In this case we determine whether an engineering firm can by contract derivatively limit its liability to reperformance. This case arises from a summary judgment in favor of appellee, UOP Inc. (UOP), against appellant, CBI NA-CON, Inc., (CBI). The summary judgment is based upon CBI’s third-party claim against UOP for contribution. CBI contends “the trial court erred in granting UOP summary judgment because the pleadings demonstrate that CBI is entitled to pursue its contribution claims under Chapter 33, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.” Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bonniwell v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. UMLIC VP LLC v. T & M Sales & Environmental Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  2. Taylor Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Directional Road Boring, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
  3. Bass v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  4. Mickens v. Longhorn DFW Moving, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Hill v. Day (In Re Today's Destiny, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API