Legal Opinion
Bass v. City of Dallas
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided August 31, 2000No. 07-99-0230-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Chief Justice.
Appellants (“Bass”) brought suit on a variety of legal theories, all of which arise out of the reconstruction of the street near Bass’ place of business. In the trial court, Bass alleged causes of action for inverse condemnation, negligence, breach of contract, trespass, and violations of their civil rights against the City of Dallas (“City”), as well as causes of action for negligence, breach of contract, and trespass against Ed Bell Construction Company (“Bell”). Bass chose to reserve the civil rights cause of action, in accordance with Guetersloh v. State, 930 S.W.2d…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ortega v. City National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District of Chambers & Harris Counties v. Jarrar's Plumbing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Sterling Chemicals, Inc. v. Texaco Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Taylor Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Directional Road Boring, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Whitten v. Vehicle Removal Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.