Legal Opinion
State v. Cunningham
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 28, 2003No. 20870-2-IIIPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
Aaron Cunningham appeals his conviction for taking a motor vehicle without permission (TMVWOP). He first maintains his sentence was based on *223an erroneous offender score. The State concedes this is partially correct because the trial court improperly included the current offense as a point in Mr. Cunningham’s criminal history. Next, Mr. Cunningham claims the trial court erred when it denied his CrR 3.5 motion to suppress based on statements made without the benefit of Miranda1 warnings. We affirm his conviction; however, we remand for correction of the offender score and sentence.
Facts
On April…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. LandsiedelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. NavaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In Re JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.