Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Hollifield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1996No. COA95-1178Published

1Opinion of the Court

473 S.E.2d 399 (1996)

Georgia Ray ANDERSON

v.

Julius Rubin HOLLIFIELD.

No. COA95-1178.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 6, 1996.

James R. Carpenter and Larry G. Hoyle, Gastonia, for plaintiff-appellant.

Colombo & Robinson by William C. Robinson, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee.

EAGLES, Judge.

We note first that there are numerous rule violations by plaintiff in this case. In our discretion, however, "we treat the purported appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and pass upon the merits of the questions raised." State v. SanMiguel, 74 N.C.App. 276, 277-78, 328 S.E.2d 326, 328 (1985)…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Camalier v. JeffriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Bromhal v. StottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Currin-Dillehay Building Supply, Inc. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Booth v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API