Board of Control of Eastern Michigan University v. Burgess
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.
On February 15, 1966, defendant signed a document which purported to grant to plaintiff a 60-day option to purchase defendant’s home. That document, which was drafted by plaintiff’s agent, acknowledged receipt by defendant of "One and no/100 ($1.00) Dollar and other valuable consideration”. Plaintiff concedes that neither the one dollar nor any other consideration was ever paid or even tendered to defendant. On April 14, 1966, plaintiff delivered to defendant written notice of its intention to exercise the option. On the closing date defendant rejected plaintiff’s tender of the purchase…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Gustin v. Union School-DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Spooner v. Detroit Saturday Night Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Bailey v. GroverMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kamalnath v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re Smith TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Oshtemo Township v. City of KalamazooMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Marina Bay Condominiums, Inc v. SchlegelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Keaster v. BozikMontana Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.