Legal Opinion

Spooner v. Detroit Saturday Night Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1915No. Docket No. 10PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Certiorari to the Industrial Accident Board. Mary Spooner presented a claim against the Detroit Saturday Night Company for the death of her husband in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is a claim made by Mary Spooner, widow of James Spooner, against the Detroit Saturday Night Company, for compensation for the death of her *126husband, under Act. No. 10, Pub. Acts 1912 (2 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] §3939 et seq.), known as the workmen’s compensation act. The Detroit Saturday Night Company, having previously suffered a fire in its plant in the city of Detroit, on Monday, February 3, 1913, entered into a contract with the Winn & Hammond Company, through T. H. Collins, its receiver, as follows:

“Detroit, Mich., Monday, February '3, 1913.
“Agreement between T. H. Collins, receiver for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rayner v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Miner v. Franklin County Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1910

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Mann v. Glastonbury Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Meyers v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Inland Steel Co. v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API