Gustin v. Union School-District
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Bay. (Cobb, J.) Bill for specific performance of contract. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
This is a bill for specific performance. The premises in question are two lots in Bay City. On January 16, 1886, the defendant school-district, through *503its proper officers, executed and delivered to George W. Mann a lease of the premises for the term of five years. Among the provisions of the lease was the following, viz.r
“Said first party agrees to execute to said second party or his assigns a deed, with full covenants of warranty, of said described land, at the expiration of this lease, upon the payment to it of the sum of $2,500, provided said second party, or his assigns, shall ask for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richardson v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hunt v. ThornMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by39 opinions
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Phenix Ins. v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Bowen v. LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Horgan v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Cummins v. BeaversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.