Legal Opinion

Gibson v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California

Decided January 4, 2002No. ED CV 94-441-RTPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT.

TIMLIN, District Judge.

The Court has read and considered plaintiffs’ and defendants’ motions for partial summary judgment, defendants’ and plaintiffs’ oppositions, and plaintiffs’ and defendants’ replies, as well as the. admissible evidence and all supplemental briefing. Based on such consideration, the Court concludes as follows:

I

BACKGROUND

Since 1978, the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Qualified Patients Assn. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. O'TOOLE v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  4. San Francisco Baykeeper v. WEST BAY SANITARY DISTRICTDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
  5. Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API