Legal Opinion
Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 21, 2004No. C01-02252 MJJPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO STRIKE EXPERT AND NON-EXPERT TESTIMONY
JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In conjunction with the Motion for Class Certification, both parties have filed a number of motions to strike particular portions of the evidence. With respect to the expert testimony, Defendant moves to strike the declarations of William Bielby and Marc *191Bendick in their entirety, and a small portion of the declaration of Richard Drogin. Plaintiffs move to strike portions of the declaration of Joan Haworth. With respect to the non-expert…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Stammco, L.L.C. v. United Tel. Co. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Fisher v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
- In re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Californians for Disability Rights, Inc. v. California Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.