Legal Opinion
Beattie v. Barnhart
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 20, 2009No. Civil Action 01-2493 (RWR)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Michael Beattie brought this action against the Commissioner of Social Security and five unnamed Social Security Administration employees alleging, in part, a wrongful failure to produce documents related to an inadvertent overpayment to Beattie, and wrongful termination of Beattie’s social security benefits. Beattie seeks a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to preserve the documents and provide benefits. Because Beattie has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm without a TRO and no…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Al-Fayed v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Ass'n of Mortgage Brokers v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Beattie v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Spadone v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lihong Xia v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Shelley v. American Postal Workers UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.